Developing Solutions for Microsoft Azure (AZ-204) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Developing Solutions for Microsoft Azure Exam. Prepare with flashcards and multiple choice questions, get hints and explanations for each question. Ace your test prep!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


Which of the following is a good example of using testing in your environment?

  1. Waiting for users to reach out to you with reports of errors in your application

  2. Performing functionality tests in the development environment that are different from production

  3. Omitting infrastructure deployment from test plans

  4. Performing regular security tests of your application code in development and production environments

The correct answer is: Performing regular security tests of your application code in development and production environments

Using regular security tests of your application code in both development and production environments is a prime example of best practices in testing within your software development lifecycle. This approach helps identify vulnerabilities early, ensuring that potential security issues are addressed before they can be exploited in production. By implementing consistent security testing, organizations can protect sensitive data, comply with regulations, and maintain the overall integrity of their applications. Moreover, conducting security tests in development allows for real-time feedback and immediate remediation, while regular tests in the production environment ensure that any new risks introduced by code changes or updates are promptly identified. This practice fosters a proactive security posture, which is essential in today’s threat landscape. The other options illustrate practices that are not ideal for a healthy testing environment. For example, waiting for users to report errors does not contribute to proactive quality assurance. Performing functionality tests that differ between development and production environments could lead to discrepancies that might not surface until later stages, which complicates error resolution. Lastly, omitting infrastructure deployment from test plans could result in overlooked dependencies and configurations, potentially leading to failures when applications are deployed.